* New Member Special: Get a 1 Year Membership for only $85 (a $35 savings!). This special membership will automatically renew at $10/mo after your first year. More great reasons to join ...
The Networking Rule of 150
posted on March 17, 2009
The Economist recently had an article titled: "Primates on Facebook," which suggests that even with social networking tools like Facebook and Twitter they still don't change the fact that 'the size of the human brain allows stable networks of about 148. Rounded to 150, this has become famous as “the Dunbar number”.'
I first became aware of the Rule of 150 after reading about it in Malcolm Gladwell's book: The Tipping Point (a great book that I highly recommend by the way). When I mentioned this article on Facebook one of my friends quipped: 'Said the man with 455 "friends."' Sure I may have a lot of connections on Facebook and LinkedIn, but I see the Rule of 150 as being a description of your core network. Certainly we've all met more than 150 people, we may even have quite a few more legitimate relationships than this theoretical 150 person limit. However if you really boil it down to the truly meaningful relationships I would image that you, like me, would come up with a number really close to 150.
Your core network in my opinion is your real network. These are your family, close friends, co-workers that you're close to, etc. The people you spend most of your time with, and have really solid relationships with. This certainly wouldn't include that guy you see a couple of times a year at this event or that event. It probably doesn't even include people you've had lunch or drinks with once or twice. These are the individuals you really spend time with, and who spend time with you where you have much deeper relationships.
So here's an interesting exercise I've been playing with. Exactly who makes up your core network? Who are these 150 people? Are they the right 150 people? There's also the theory that says you're most likely to be like the people you spend the most time with. It's probably a smaller subset of the 150 that this theory applies to, but it's an important concept to pay attention to.
Consider making an actual list to get a better understanding of what your own core network looks like.
That's just my 2 cents. What do you think? I'm very interested in your thoughts and comments.
Happy Networking!
Scott Ingram
NetworkInAustin.com
P.S. I'm considering writing a follow-up post. Something along the lines of: Beyond the Rule of 150 - The Impact of Social Networking Tools on Network Size. I have some definite opinions, but don't want to taint your thoughts with mine... yet. :)
Author: Scott Ingram
Categories: Business Networking, Facebook, LinkedIn, Networking Tips, Online Networking, Scott Ingram, Twitter
Categories
- Uncategorized (1)
- Austin (93)
- Business Advice (103)
- Business Blogging (30)
- Business Book Authors (12)
- Business Books (3)
- Business Cards (1)
- Business Networking (195)
- Career Networking (10)
- Competition (7)
- Facebook (3)
- Guest Blogger (4)
- Guest Post (1)
- Job Networking (13)
- LinkedIn (9)
- NetworkInAustin.com (20)
- Networking Events (50)
- Networking Tips (165)
- Online Networking (9)
- Personal (41)
- Scott Ingram (249)
- Social Networking (8)
- Twitter (7)
- Why Join Network In Austin? (11)
Archives
- March 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (17)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (7)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (3)
- June 2009 (7)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (8)
- December 2008 (1)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (8)
- September 2008 (4)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (3)
- June 2008 (4)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (1)
- September 2007 (3)
- August 2007 (1)
- July 2007 (3)
- June 2007 (4)
- March 2007 (4)
- February 2007 (6)
- January 2007 (10)
- December 2006 (2)
- November 2006 (8)
- October 2006 (4)
- September 2006 (1)
- August 2006 (5)
- July 2006 (6)
- June 2006 (3)
- May 2006 (6)
- April 2006 (8)
- March 2006 (9)
- February 2006 (4)
- January 2006 (8)
- December 2005 (7)
- November 2005 (11)
- October 2005 (9)
- September 2005 (8)
- August 2005 (14)
- July 2005 (11)
- June 2005 (5)